- Swansea (Main) 01792 773 773
- Cardiff 03333 209 242
- Carmarthen 01267 234 022
- Fishguard 01348 873 671
- Haverfordwest 01437 764 723
- Rural Practice 01267 266 944
- St Davids 01348 873 671
- Please note that all phone calls are recorded
Ask The Legal Expert: Livestock Security And You
- AuthorAlice Dearden Cobbett
Alice Dearden Cobbett, Associate Solicitor in the Rural Practice Team at JCP Solicitors, provides some sound advice on what to expect when the unexpected happens to your livestock.
"I run a livestock farm and I’m concerned about a recent legal case which saw a driver suffer injuries after his car collided with an escaped steer. I do all I can to secure my livestock. Where would I stand if something like this happened to me?"
The case you are referring to, Williams v Hawkes, was heard in the Court of Appeal and is one many farmers will have followed with interest.
Farmer Derfyl Hawkes bought some Charolais steers and let them onto pasture on his farm. The next day, one steer was spooked, jumped a six-foot fence and other obstacles, travelling more than a mile onto a dual carriageway where it was hit by a car. The animal died on impact, with the driver suffering serious injuries.
The driver brought a claim both in negligence and under the Animals Act 1971 against Derfyl Hawkes’ estate.
The judge commented that the care of the animal provided by Derfyl and his son Jeffrey had been "impeccable" and his fencing was "entirely appropriate". It was also accepted that the farmers had carried out sufficient checks on their steers and couldn't’t have predicted the escape. The County Court dismissed the negligence claim.
However, Jeffrey Hawkes, as the representative of his father’s estate, was ordered to pay compensation to the driver as he was strictly liable for damage caused by the steer under section 2 of the Animals Act 1971. The 1971 Act was designed to make the owners of dangerous animals liable for damage, and for this liability to apply where non-dangerous animals exhibit a dangerous characteristic.
The 1971 Act contains the following three tests which, if met, it will mean you are liable for damage caused even when you are not negligent;
(a) the animal was, unless restrained, likely to cause damage OR if the animal caused damage, it was likely to be severe; AND (b) that damage would be caused by a characteristic EITHER (i) not usually found in that type of animal; or (ii) only found in that type of animal at particular times and in particular circumstances; and (c) those characteristics were known to the keeper.
Rejecting Mr Hawkes's appeal, Lord Justice Davis said liability under the Act did not require proof of negligence. He found that the steer displayed behaviour that would only be shown by cattle ‘in particular circumstances’. This was supported by an expert, who told the court that being near a major road, with its lights and noise, was likely to make any cattle unpredictable.
The three linked requirements above had, in this case, been satisfied. But farmers should be aware that the strict liability test is complex and there are defences to it. Getting sound advice early is critical.
JCP’s Rural Practice team is on hand for tailored and professional legal support. For specialist legal advice, call Alice Dearden Cobbett on: 01792 525 463 or: firstname.lastname@example.org
Alice Dearden Cobbett is a fluent Welsh speaker from Carmarthenshire and brings with her sound legal training, alongside several years of experience working within the racing and wider equestrian industries. Alice has hands-on experience in the disciplines and realities of rural life which is a real asset to our agricultural clients.
The question posed is based upon a hypothetical situation.